What's
this about RMS?
-DanF
Exactly what does
the 400 Watts RMS rating mean. I.e. is it one channel driven, two channels
driven, all channels driven?
First, a point of clarification. The term "RMS Watts" has no engineering
meaning; however it is usually interpreted to mean Average Watts based
on RMS voltage measurements into a reference impendence. As a practical
matter, the measurements are usually done into a standard resistor. Klipsch's
rating is based on this method with the following conditions:
- The system is hooked up to 120 V.
- All channels are driven simultaneously; the satellites into 3.6 ohm
loads; and the sub into 1.8 ohms. In the case of the subwoofer rating,
the 1.8 ohm reference impendence is derived from the minimum impendence
specification (2 ohms -10%)for two four-ohm subwoofer drivers hooked in
parallel.
- the satellite channels get 1 kHz input signal, the sub channel gets
100 Hz.
- the output voltage on each channel is recorded at the onset of clipping.
- The resulting calculation for each channel is added together to give
the final result. If each channel is driven separately, you are likely
to see voltages that allow up to 75 Watts at each satellite. Note that
these are RMS values,and for sine waves, RMS is about 1/2 of peak power
ratings.
If the amplifier were rated for peak values, it would be about 800 Watts.
Peak Music Power Output does refer to milliseconds of signal duration
and doesn't really present a useable figure for audio signal reproduction.
Short term continuous refers to 30 to 60 seconds worth of full power,
after which some heating will take place. Most program material, as you
probably know averages 10 dB below peak values, so the amplifier is running
relatively cool. Then, a relatively long duration crescendo would test
the upper limits for this short but meaningful time. This is the pattern
that music and other program materials follow, and so the amplifier was
tailored for optimum performance under those conditions. A 30 minute rating
would be somewhat less, but probably in the 250-300 Watt range.
The "onset of clipping" is around 1% THD. Not a lot more power is observed
at higher distortion levels.
A few additional clarifications: There are some speaker protection circuits
in the system, which would make independent measurements a little tricky;
however sine-pulse testing would confirm these levels. Some audio gear
is rated at long-term continuous as opposed to short term continuous.
This component is rated for short term, which relates more directly to
how audio gear is actually used (i.e., unless your program IS in fact
8 hours of sine waves, the difference between the two methods is not significant,
audio-wise). The difference in hardware, between a system that would be
long-term continuous (and this one) is about $50 worth of aluminum. Since
this is a switching power supply, the size of the power supply has no
relation to the power output, as it might in conventional audio gear.
We're just going to have to get used to our audio equipment getting lighter
weight, and higher performance...
The combination of efficient power supply and optimum power design is
what allows a 400 Watt amplifier in such a small space in the first place.
The reference impendence of the amplifier is in fact different from the
impendence typically measured on the speakers. The speaker impendence
is typically dialed in by the system designer based on a number of factors
including several independent of the amplifier (such as optimum level
and headroom matching of subs and sats). In the case of the ProMedia systems,
the satellite speakers themselves would probably get an independent impendence
rating of around 6 ohms
>>What's the recommended placement in a 12 x 12 room to get performance
that is as neutral possible<<
Corner placement almost always reveals the nominal character of the subwoofer.
This is where the room effects are minimal, and the gain of the three
reflecting surfaces is as uniform as possible. That said, if I were trying
to knock down a 70 Hz bump in a square room, I would try to find a point
along the diagonal that coincided with a null, to get the smoothest possible
response. Could be two feet from the corner, could be five.
|
Browse Hot Topic Help
What's this about RMS?
Manufaturer's spec ratings after Nov. 4, 1974
5.1 Speaker Setup
PowerDVD 4.0 XP
DD-51 Setup
DD-51 Setup Part 2
Getting 5.1 on SBLive 5.1
Getting 5.1 on GTXP 6.1
Getting 5.1 on Audigy
Getting 5.1 on Santa Cruz
Getting 5.1 on Acoustic Edge
Calculate Peaks and Nulls
|